linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: 32 bit userland on G5
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:31:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150241510.11159.159.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17551.16830.186314.247458@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:52 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Historically the PPC32 ELF ABI has used an executable PLT, containing
> instructions constructed at runtime, located next to the BSS, and
> without the corresponding program header entry indicating execute
> permission.  Alan Modra devised a new way of doing the PLT which
> doesn't require it to be executable, but of course it is only used in
> programs that have been built since the new method went into the
> toolchain (in fact all of the .o files being linked have to have been
> compiled with the new method in order for it to be used).

'Historical' being until about 4 years ago, around the time of
http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2002-05/msg00097.html ?

> So if you are absolutely sure that every program you will ever want to
> run on your kernel has been built with an up-to-date toolchain, you
> can turn on enforcement of execute permissions for 32-bit processes.
> It would be a "courageous" step (in the Yes Minister sense :) for a
> distro to do it, IMHO. 

We already did it in Fedora. We don't default to READ_IMPLIES_EXEC for
32-bit processes on the 64-bit kernel.

-- 
dwmw2

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-13 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-13 10:25 32 bit userland on G5 Johannes Berg
2006-06-13 12:45 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 16:05   ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-13 16:15     ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 16:18       ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-13 22:52   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-06-13 23:31     ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2006-06-13 23:46       ` Paul Mackerras
2006-06-14  0:04         ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 22:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-06-14  8:35   ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1150241510.11159.159.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).