From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1023967A73 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:07:52 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Do a bit more cpu init cleanups From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: <20060627225401.GC5130@pb15.lixom.net> References: <20060627192206.GB5130@pb15.lixom.net> <1151446849.2350.95.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060627225401.GC5130@pb15.lixom.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:07:41 +1000 Message-Id: <1151449661.2350.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 15:54 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:20:48AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:22 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > Cleanup CPU inits a bit more, Geoff Levand already did some earlier. > > > > > > * Rename cpu_setup_power4.S to cpu_setup_ppc970.S > > > > > * Move CPU state save to cpu_setup, since cpu_setup is only ever done > > > on cpu 0 on 64-bit. > > > > Nah, keep that one separate, will be needed as soon as we start doing > > some sleep/wake stuff for ppc64 > > Why? I can see having to restore the settings on wake, but not doing a > brand new cpu_setup. No, a new save, not setup. > > > * Rename __restore_cpu_setup to __restore_cpu_setup_ppc970 since it's > > > only actually doing anything there, and check before calling instead > > > of in the function (no check needed on powermac). > > > > I'd like to keep a generic save/restore.. that or we put then in > > cputable. > > Keep? There never was one. :) There is one for 32 bits :) > Since restore is called very first thing in smp secondary init, we don't > have cputable available. We could easily Ben.