From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081A367B21 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:11:01 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: References: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD467306E19B76@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:10:52 +1000 Message-Id: <1151572252.28229.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Wei-r63237 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > Even though other 86xx platforms have no these PCI chips, these > > codes will not take effect. > > Its code bloat for systems that dont need it. Well... it depends :) If it's totally unlikely to ever have this chip in those platforms, then yes. But if it's common enough, it's fair to have the quirk in a generic place (provided that Whang is right and the fixup is indeed the same for all 86xx platforms) Ben.