From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Cc: Chad.Rowan@thyssenkrupp.com
Subject: export-objs in spi Makefile broke in latest linuxppc_2_4_deve l [r eposted]?
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:55:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153371343.6004.16.camel@Zeus.EmbLux> (raw)
In-Reply-To:
Hello Chad
> linuxppc_2_4_devel is alive and well.
>
> http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=linuxppc_2_4_devel.git;a=shortlog
You speak from the DENX linuxppc_2_4_devel Kernel? If so, I think you are right.
I had the same problem, some days ago. I made a SPI bitbanging algorithm, but
I dont know, if this goes in the git repository from DENX ... Wolfgang?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak at kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:17 PM
> To: Rowan, Chad
> Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: export-objs in spi Makefile broke in latest linuxppc_2_4_devel
> [r eposted]?
>
>
> > On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Rowan, Chad wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't export-objs in drivers/spi be:
> >
> > export-objs := spi-core.o spi-algo-mpc5xxx.o spi-algo-mpc5xxx-psc.o \
> > spi-iti5200.o spi-eval.o
> >
> > instead of:
> >
> > export-objs := spi-core.o spi-algo-mpc5xxx.o spi-algo-mpc5200psc.o \
> > spi-iti5200.o spi-eval.o
> >
> > I believe the spi-algo-mpc5200psc.o should be spi-algo-mpc5xxx-psc.o,
> > correct?
>
> Are you really serious about linuxppc_2_4_devel? I can't believe
> linuxppc_2_4_devel has changed in months (if not over a year).
Commit: 98b663155ab7ab07dd85a8d03f437ab4fc29476b
Author: Wolfgang Denk <wd@pollux.denx.de> Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:17:25 +0200
MCC200: fix QuadUART I/O addressing and interrupt init on new H/W
Patch by Johann Glaser, 13 Jul 2006
It progresses ;-)
Best regards
Heiko
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-20 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-20 4:55 Heiko Schocher [this message]
2006-07-20 13:12 ` export-objs in spi Makefile broke in latest linuxppc_2_4_deve l [r eposted]? Kumar Gala
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-20 14:09 Rowan, Chad
2006-07-20 13:38 Rowan, Chad
2006-07-20 13:52 ` Kumar Gala
2006-07-19 22:02 Rowan, Chad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153371343.6004.16.camel@Zeus.EmbLux \
--to=hs@denx.de \
--cc=Chad.Rowan@thyssenkrupp.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).