From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A808C67A3D for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:56:44 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH][0/2] RTAS MSI From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jake Moilanen In-Reply-To: <1154024154.29826.229.camel@goblue> References: <1154024154.29826.229.camel@goblue> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:56:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1154062599.21801.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 13:15 -0500, Jake Moilanen wrote: > Here is a rebased RTAS MSI which uses the IRQ layer rewrite. Please try > getting it into 2.6.18. > > I mistakenly forgot to export the MSI symbols. So modules weren't too > happy... > > The RTAS patch skips the intel-centric MSI layer and uses > pci_enable/disable_msi() calls directly. It does not correctly handle > multi-vector MSI either. Multi-vector MSIs aren't handled by the linux API anyway it seems (the doc says pci_enable_msi() only ever enables one MSI) so that's fine if you don't handle them :) The word on the street is that multivector MSIs aren't useful, MSI-X are. Ben.