From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1B067C3B for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 04:27:39 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources? From: Jon Loeliger To: Tom Rini In-Reply-To: <20060802182143.GP3075@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <1154464346.19994.4.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> <1154466094.11069.6.camel@localhost> <20060802003504.GA20439@mag.az.mvista.com> <1154481150.2676.3.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <528646bc0608012020l11690cf7wbb7d93e6ba6eae90@mail.gmail.com> <33AC4A3A-876A-4AF9-B851-928EE80A9D80@kernel.crashing.org> <20060802163822.GK3075@smtp.west.cox.net> <1154542161.5550.25.camel@localhost> <20060802182143.GP3075@smtp.west.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1154542988.19994.36.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:23:08 -0500 Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 13:21, Tom Rini wrote: > Yes, as I said, I'm not totally sure we're at the stable point right > now, but I think that we are. I'll add that maybe we need to think > about API changes and DTS format versions. To quote from my post.. > > > > X bugs) or a change that requires a dts version bump. > > Now it sounds like the IRQ thing was an "Oops, we should have changed > the dts version" and bailed, noting what is wrong with the dts. This confuses me. There hasn't been a change in the DTS format at all. I've even updated the 8641HPCN DTS file across the IRQ updates and all is fine. Same (DTS) format both before and after the IRQ changes. What have I missed here? And yes, I'm trying to figure out where to _put_ the 8641 DTS file now too... :-) jdl