From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <msm@freescale.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] New target 'cuImage' - compatibility uImage
From: Matthew McClintock <msm@freescale.com>
To: Li Yang-r58472 <LeoLi@freescale.com>
In-Reply-To: <4879B0C6C249214CBE7AB04453F84E4D0B2F61@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net>
References: <4879B0C6C249214CBE7AB04453F84E4D0B2F61@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:30:13 -0500
Message-Id: <1154619014.5094.7.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 04:47 -0700, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
> If my understanding to Matt's idea is correct, it will be a good way,
> IMHO.  How about use the naming of uwImage(U-boot Wrapped Image) or
> utImage(u-boot device-Tree Image). 

I am completely open to a better name. Anyone else care to share their
opinion?

-Matthew