From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@jdub.homelinux.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources?
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:56:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155128205.3944.1.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1155122309.4040.94.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 13:18 +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:32 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Where should we place the sources for the OF Flat Device
> > Tree source files? They used to be in U-Boot, but that
> > isn't happening any more.
>
> Why ? While having device-tree's in zImages is good to handle firmwares
> that can't pass them, I still think that the proper thing to do is to
> have the firmware provide the DT to the kernel. Did Denk decide once for
> all against having DTs passed by uboot at all ? In which case, it's
> probably time to consider a fork...
We're only talking about the _source_ files. The .dts files. Not the
binary trees themselves.
The basic summary is that having a .dts in the kernel for every
defconfig would be good. (I think that was the summary anyway.)
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-09 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-01 20:32 RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources? Jon Loeliger
2006-08-01 21:00 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-08-01 21:01 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-02 0:35 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 0:42 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 1:12 ` Josh Boyer
2006-08-02 3:20 ` Grant Likely
2006-08-02 13:35 ` Kumar Gala
2006-08-02 16:38 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-02 18:09 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-02 18:16 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-08-02 18:21 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-02 18:23 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-08-02 18:57 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-02 20:06 ` Kumar Gala
2006-08-03 14:49 ` Li Yang
2006-08-03 15:47 ` Li Yang
2006-08-02 18:24 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 18:23 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 18:21 ` Grant Likely
2006-08-02 18:49 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 19:03 ` Josh Boyer
2006-08-02 19:26 ` Kumar Gala
2006-08-02 18:22 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 18:22 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-02 18:42 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 18:25 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-08-02 18:34 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-02 18:41 ` Brent Cook
2006-08-02 18:51 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-03 0:35 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-02 3:35 ` Li Yang-r58472
2006-08-04 4:51 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-09 11:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-09 12:56 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2006-08-09 16:38 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-09 16:48 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-08-09 17:03 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-09 14:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-08-09 16:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-09 18:47 ` Andy Fleming
2006-08-09 19:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-03 9:32 Milton Miller
2006-08-03 13:54 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-03 16:30 ` Milton Miller
2006-08-04 4:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-04 17:54 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-04 23:29 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1155128205.3944.1.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@jdub.homelinux.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).