From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from admin.zirkelwireless.com (admin.zirkelwireless.com [209.216.203.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEF167BD4 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:21:07 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] no-execute -- please test From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= To: Albert Cahalan In-Reply-To: <787b0d920608140908x391e926cs7c1023cb7ab5597f@mail.gmail.com> References: <787b0d920608132020q4ad2b5c2y49e25ca7ecc33536@mail.gmail.com> <1155547172.12664.115.camel@thor.lorrainebruecke.local> <787b0d920608140908x391e926cs7c1023cb7ab5597f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:20:57 +0200 Message-Id: <1155572457.12664.143.camel@thor.lorrainebruecke.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, debian-powerpc List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:08 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > The module failing is not actually the problem. > I get GLcore failing with a numeric error message > (grrr... like an original Mac or Amiga, or LILO) What more explanation than 'undefined symbol' do you need? You're not supposed to load GLcore explicitly, it'll be loaded automatically when needed by the glx module. The diff between the log files doesn't show any explanation as to why it works in one case but doesn't in the other, maybe the difference really lies on the client side? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer