From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] bootwrapper: arch/powerpc/boot code reorg patches From: Hollis Blanchard To: "Mark A. Greer" In-Reply-To: <20060808191450.GA10108@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <20060719225356.GA3887@mag.az.mvista.com> <20060808191450.GA10108@mag.az.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:37:06 -0500 Message-Id: <1155670626.6338.3.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:14 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > Just a note that I will respin my patches to address all of your > comments. However, it looks like the fdt code is going to change > to use code from a common source base. I'm going to wait until > that has settled and then I'll modify the code and repost the patches. By the way, I don't expect the (ft_build.h) interface to change much from what I emailed last week. So I think it's safe to build on top of those. The only addition I'd like to make is creating an ft_set_prop() that will handle resizing the tree for you. With that change, you wouldn't ft_get_prop() and then write directly to that pointer (as is done currently). I'm still waiting to hear the outcome of Matt's patches. I don't need them, but if u-boot does then I'll have to merge them into the standalone code. -Hollis