From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7617E67B32 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:00:05 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Directly reference i8259@4d0 nodes in mpc8641_hpcn.dts. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: "Mark A. Greer" In-Reply-To: <20060818004301.GA8734@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <1155835482.10054.140.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> <1155840700.27466.64.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> <1155849609.10054.175.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> <1155859761.5803.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060818004301.GA8734@mag.az.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:59:48 +1000 Message-Id: <1155866388.5803.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 17:43 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:09:21AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:20 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > > Rather than using some hand-coded linux,phandle > > > node references, use DTC's direct node refs ability > > > and let it manage the phandle names instead. > > > > Not 100% sure here but can't we use a label and do &label rather than > > having to copy the full path every time ? Would make things easier :) If > > not, that's probably something to add to dtc... > > Isn't linux,phandle basically the label that you speak of, though? > IOW, you may be saying, "No, keep using the linux,phandle". No, more something like pic: and later &pic > Just trying to clarify things although I'm not sure that I really am... :) > > Mark