* 82xx fcc_enet problem between Linux 2.4 and 2.6
@ 2006-08-31 17:46 Laurent Lagrange
2006-09-01 11:43 ` Bastos Fernandez Alexandre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Lagrange @ 2006-08-31 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Hello,
I work on several custom 82xx boards with Linux 2.4 and 2.6.
I have ported Linux 2.6.9 on different boards and I noticed
that I have tx carrier errors on my FCC ports. Almost one
error per xmit.
I reinstalled Linux 2.4.18 on these boards and I have NO ERROR.
The errors arise with PHY configured in 100M full duplex (or autoneg).
The FCC has the same duplex as PHY.
I found on web another mail concerning a problem on PQ2FADS Linux2.6.8
when mounting a NFS. The writer has also noticed that he has
tx carrier errors but the mail focused on mount and not FCC.
> # ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:17:40:00:03
> inet addr:192.168.0.5 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:122 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:114 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:114
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:20747 (20.2 kb) TX bytes:14320 (13.9 kb)
> Base address:0x8500
I think this is not a phy or hardware problem but rather a FCC configuration
mismatch in fcc_enet.c.
Thanks for any tips
Laurent
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 82xx fcc_enet problem between Linux 2.4 and 2.6
2006-08-31 17:46 82xx fcc_enet problem between Linux 2.4 and 2.6 Laurent Lagrange
@ 2006-09-01 11:43 ` Bastos Fernandez Alexandre
2006-09-01 14:26 ` Laurent Lagrange
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bastos Fernandez Alexandre @ 2006-09-01 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laurent Lagrange; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
Laurent,
>
> I work on several custom 82xx boards with Linux 2.4 and 2.6.
>
> I have ported Linux 2.6.9 on different boards and I noticed
> that I have tx carrier errors on my FCC ports. Almost one
> error per xmit.
>
I have experienced same problem. I suppose you are using the old
fcc driver in /arch/ppc
> I reinstalled Linux 2.4.18 on these boards and I have NO ERROR.
>
> The errors arise with PHY configured in 100M full duplex (or autoneg).
> The FCC has the same duplex as PHY.
Are you sure? In my case, the problem was that while the PHY had autoneg
to full-duplex, the MAC kept in half-duplex mode
> [...]
>
> I think this is not a phy or hardware problem but rather a FCC configuration
> mismatch in fcc_enet.c.
>
Yes. But I thing the driver has been obsoleted by fs_enet one,
so modifiying it now has no sense.
Best regards,
Alex BASTOS
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: 82xx fcc_enet problem between Linux 2.4 and 2.6
2006-09-01 11:43 ` Bastos Fernandez Alexandre
@ 2006-09-01 14:26 ` Laurent Lagrange
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Lagrange @ 2006-09-01 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Bastos Fernandez Alexandre'; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
Hello Alex,
> > I have ported Linux 2.6.9 on different boards and I noticed
> > that I have tx carrier errors on my FCC ports. Almost one
> > error per xmit.
> I have experienced same problem. I suppose you are using the old
> fcc driver in /arch/ppc
Yes that's right.
> > I reinstalled Linux 2.4.18 on these boards and I have NO ERROR.
> > The errors arise with PHY configured in 100M full duplex (or autoneg).
> > The FCC has the same duplex as PHY.
> Are you sure? In my case, the problem was that while the PHY had autoneg
> to full-duplex, the MAC kept in half-duplex mode
I have modified some code in fcc_enet.c for Linux 2.4 to manage PHY as I
wanted.
Perhaps was I in luck to correct something wrong. I checked that the duplex
were identical for FCC and PHY and I had no carrier error.
> > I think this is not a phy or hardware problem but rather a
> FCC configuration mismatch in fcc_enet.c.
> Yes. But I think the driver has been obsoleted by fs_enet one,
> so modifiying it now has no sense.
Yes I retreived fs_enet in Linux 2.6.15 and I'll try it.
This driver seems to appear in Linux 2.6.11 tree not before.
Is it right ?
Thanks very much for your reply.
Best regards
Laurent
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-01 14:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-31 17:46 82xx fcc_enet problem between Linux 2.4 and 2.6 Laurent Lagrange
2006-09-01 11:43 ` Bastos Fernandez Alexandre
2006-09-01 14:26 ` Laurent Lagrange
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).