* [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
@ 2006-09-06 0:26 Sachin P. Sant
2006-09-06 2:59 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sachin P. Sant @ 2006-09-06 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: fastboot-bounces
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
The following kernel patch [ along with a patch to kexec tools posted
seperately ]
is required to generate proper core files using kdump on ppc64.
Thanks
-Sachin
[-- Attachment #2: ppc64-kexec-tools-64k-page-support --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]
* Generate proper core files using kdump on ppc64 with 64k page support.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
---
diff -Naurp a/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h b/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h 2006-08-31 03:01:13.000000000 +0530
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h 2006-08-31 05:49:13.000000000 +0530
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
/* How many bytes to reserve at zero for kdump. The reserve limit should
* be greater or equal to the trampoline's end address.
* Reserve to the end of the FWNMI area, see head_64.S */
-#define KDUMP_RESERVE_LIMIT 0x8000
+#define KDUMP_RESERVE_LIMIT max(0x8000, PAGE_SIZE)
#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
2006-09-06 0:26 [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size Sachin P. Sant
@ 2006-09-06 2:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-09-06 6:13 ` Haren Myneni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2006-09-06 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sachin P. Sant; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --]
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 05:56 +0530, Sachin P. Sant wrote:
> The following kernel patch [ along with a patch to kexec tools posted
> seperately ]
> is required to generate proper core files using kdump on ppc64.
Hi Sachin,
Can you provide some more explanation? It's not clear to me why this is
necessary.
thanks
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
2006-09-06 2:59 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2006-09-06 6:13 ` Haren Myneni
2006-09-07 0:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Haren Myneni @ 2006-09-06 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michael; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Sachin P. Sant
Michael Ellerman wrote:
>On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 05:56 +0530, Sachin P. Sant wrote:
>
>
>>The following kernel patch [ along with a patch to kexec tools posted
>>seperately ]
>>is required to generate proper core files using kdump on ppc64.
>>
>>
>
>Hi Sachin,
>
>Can you provide some more explanation? It's not clear to me why this is
>necessary.
>
>thanks
>
>
>
At present we are doing the backup of 32K. Thus created one ELF PT_LOAD
segment for this region.
But, in the case of 64K page size, second segments starts at 32K and the
first one is not page aligned. __ioremap() (crash_dump.c) getting
failed if pfn = 0 which is the case for the second PT_LOAD segment. We
did not hit this issue for 4K page size because the the first page (32K
backup) is copied to second kernel memory and thus referencing with the
second kernel pfn.
Here the fix is, backup regions size is max(PAGE_SIZE, 32K) so that
at least one page will be part of backup ELF segment. Drawback here is,
we will end up 32K more for backup for 64K page size.
It can also be fixed in copy_oldmem_page() (crash_dump.c), but first
PT_LOAD segment is not page aligned:
if (pfn > 0)
vaddr = __ioremap(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
else
vaddr = __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
Thanks
Haren
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
>https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
2006-09-06 6:13 ` Haren Myneni
@ 2006-09-07 0:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-08 1:00 ` Sachin P. Sant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2006-09-07 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Haren Myneni; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Sachin P. Sant
> At present we are doing the backup of 32K. Thus created one ELF PT_LOAD
> segment for this region.
> But, in the case of 64K page size, second segments starts at 32K and the
> first one is not page aligned. __ioremap() (crash_dump.c) getting
> failed if pfn = 0 which is the case for the second PT_LOAD segment. We
> did not hit this issue for 4K page size because the the first page (32K
> backup) is copied to second kernel memory and thus referencing with the
> second kernel pfn.
>
> Here the fix is, backup regions size is max(PAGE_SIZE, 32K) so that
> at least one page will be part of backup ELF segment. Drawback here is,
> we will end up 32K more for backup for 64K page size.
You should always do 64k regardless of the page size. I think we have
some ABI requirements here for ELF sections to be 64k aligned anyway
no ?
> It can also be fixed in copy_oldmem_page() (crash_dump.c), but first
> PT_LOAD segment is not page aligned:
>
> if (pfn > 0)
> vaddr = __ioremap(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> else
> vaddr = __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
2006-09-07 0:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2006-09-08 1:00 ` Sachin P. Sant
2006-09-08 1:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sachin P. Sant @ 2006-09-08 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
> You should always do 64k regardless of the page size. I think we have
> some ABI requirements here for ELF sections to be 64k aligned anyway
> no ?
>
>
Ben are you aware of any doc where i can find more information. I
checked the
64Bit PowerPC ELF ABI doc but couldn't find any specific information about
this.
Also other question is If we create a 64k segment irrespective of page size
[ as compared to 32k currently ] we would be writing extra 32k even for
page size of 4K. Which means we have 32k less memory for the kdump
kernel. Wouldn't that be an issue ?
Thanks
-Sachin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
2006-09-08 1:00 ` Sachin P. Sant
@ 2006-09-08 1:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-08 2:29 ` Sachin P. Sant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2006-09-08 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sachin P. Sant; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 06:30 +0530, Sachin P. Sant wrote:
> > You should always do 64k regardless of the page size. I think we have
> > some ABI requirements here for ELF sections to be 64k aligned anyway
> > no ?
> >
> >
> Ben are you aware of any doc where i can find more information. I
> checked the
> 64Bit PowerPC ELF ABI doc but couldn't find any specific information about
> this.
>
> Also other question is If we create a 64k segment irrespective of page size
> [ as compared to 32k currently ] we would be writing extra 32k even for
> page size of 4K. Which means we have 32k less memory for the kdump
> kernel. Wouldn't that be an issue ?
32k sounds like a drop of water in the kdump pool ...
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
2006-09-08 1:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2006-09-08 2:29 ` Sachin P. Sant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sachin P. Sant @ 2006-09-08 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1489 bytes --]
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 06:30 +0530, Sachin P. Sant wrote:
>
>>> You should always do 64k regardless of the page size. I think we have
>>> some ABI requirements here for ELF sections to be 64k aligned anyway
>>> no ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ben are you aware of any doc where i can find more information. I
>> checked the
>> 64Bit PowerPC ELF ABI doc but couldn't find any specific information about
>> this.
>>
>> Also other question is If we create a 64k segment irrespective of page size
>> [ as compared to 32k currently ] we would be writing extra 32k even for
>> page size of 4K. Which means we have 32k less memory for the kdump
>> kernel. Wouldn't that be an issue ?
>>
>
> 32k sounds like a drop of water in the kdump pool ...
>
> Ben.
>
>
The following kernel patch [ along with a patch to kexec tools posted
seperately ]is required to generate proper core files using kdump on ppc64.
* Create a backup region of 64K size irrespective of the PAGE SIZE.
At present 32K was used as backup size. In the case of 64K page size,
second
PT_LOAD segments starts at 32K and the first one is not page aligned.
__ioremap() (crash_dump.c) fails if pfn = 0 which is the case for the
second
PT_LOAD segment. This is not an issue for 4K page size because the the
first
page (32K backup) is copied to second kernel memory and thus referencing
with the second kernel pfn.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Thanks
-Sachin
[-- Attachment #2: 64k-backup-size-for-kdump --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1073 bytes --]
* Create a backup region of 64K size irrespective of the PAGE SIZE.
At present 32K was used as backup size. In the case of 64K page size, second
PT_LOAD segments starts at 32K and the first one is not page aligned.
__ioremap() (crash_dump.c) fails if pfn = 0 which is the case for the second
PT_LOAD segment. This is not an issue for 4K page size because the the first
page (32K backup) is copied to second kernel memory and thus referencing
with the second kernel pfn.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
---
diff -Naurp a/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h b/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h 2006-09-01 00:40:10.000000000 +0530
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/kdump.h 2006-09-08 07:12:18.000000000 +0530
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
/* How many bytes to reserve at zero for kdump. The reserve limit should
* be greater or equal to the trampoline's end address.
* Reserve to the end of the FWNMI area, see head_64.S */
-#define KDUMP_RESERVE_LIMIT 0x8000
+#define KDUMP_RESERVE_LIMIT 0x10000 /* 64K */
#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-08 2:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-06 0:26 [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size Sachin P. Sant
2006-09-06 2:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-09-06 6:13 ` Haren Myneni
2006-09-07 0:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-08 1:00 ` Sachin P. Sant
2006-09-08 1:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-08 2:29 ` Sachin P. Sant
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).