linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Haren Myneni <haren@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size.
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:51:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157590304.22705.267.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44FE6700.8080504@us.ibm.com>


> At present we are doing the backup of 32K. Thus created one ELF PT_LOAD 
> segment for this region.
> But, in the case of 64K page size, second segments starts at 32K and the 
> first one is not page aligned.  __ioremap() (crash_dump.c) getting 
> failed if pfn = 0 which is the case for the second PT_LOAD segment.  We 
> did not hit this issue for 4K page size because the the first page (32K 
> backup) is copied to second kernel memory and thus referencing with the 
> second kernel pfn.
> 
> Here the fix is,  backup regions size is max(PAGE_SIZE,  32K)  so that 
> at least one page will be part of backup ELF segment.  Drawback here is, 
> we will end up 32K more for backup for 64K page size.

You should always do 64k regardless of the page size. I think we have
some ABI requirements here for ELF sections to be 64k aligned anyway
no ?

> It can also be fixed in copy_oldmem_page() (crash_dump.c), but first 
> PT_LOAD segment is not page aligned:
> 
> if (pfn > 0)
>     vaddr = __ioremap(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> else
>     vaddr = __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-07  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-06  0:26 [PATCH] kdump : Support kernels having 64k page size Sachin P. Sant
2006-09-06  2:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-09-06  6:13   ` Haren Myneni
2006-09-07  0:51     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-09-08  1:00       ` Sachin P. Sant
2006-09-08  1:08         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-08  2:29           ` Sachin P. Sant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1157590304.22705.267.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=haren@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).