From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C55B67B79 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:59:06 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [4/5] powerpc: PA Semi PWRficient platform support From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: References: <20060904175742.5472a6fa@localhost.localdomain> <20060905122956.2cebd36d@localhost.localdomain> <0C880511-D99D-4160-9EB1-A66B22B2D82F@kernel.crashing.org> <20060906101034.404014f7@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:58:52 +1000 Message-Id: <1157590732.22705.274.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 17:26 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> Very nice, I'll convert maple to do the same (unless someone beats > >> me to it, heh). > > > > Maple isn't that different there. It just has to deal with multiple > > ISUs, > > while we currently only have one. > > Maple has only one as well, that's the point :-) > It gets the ISU address from that awful platform-open-pic > property currently, hardcoding it like you did for PA6T is > just fine though. It simplifies the code quite a bit and > doesn't depend on this undocumented (and badly defined no > matter what) device tree property. It's perfectly documented :) Ben.