linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes for the SLB shadow buffer
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:55:39 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1158.1186106139@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30559.1186046895@neuling.org>

We sometimes change the vmalloc segment in slb_flush_and_rebolt but we
never updated with slb shadow buffer.  This fixes it.  Thanks to paulus
for finding this.

Also added some write barriers to ensure the shadow buffer is always
valid.

Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
---
Integrated more comments from people.

 arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S   |    3 +++
 arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c  |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c            |   28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
 include/asm-powerpc/mmu-hash64.h |    1 +
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-ozlabs.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -389,8 +389,11 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
 	ld	r9,PACA_SLBSHADOWPTR(r13)
 	li	r12,0
 	std	r12,SLBSHADOW_STACKESID(r9) /* Clear ESID */
+	eieio
 	std	r7,SLBSHADOW_STACKVSID(r9)  /* Save VSID */
+	eieio
 	std	r0,SLBSHADOW_STACKESID(r9)  /* Save ESID */
+	eieio
 
 	slbie	r6
 	slbie	r6		/* Workaround POWER5 < DD2.1 issue */
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-ozlabs.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
+++ linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ int hash_page(unsigned long ea, unsigned
 		   mmu_psize_defs[mmu_vmalloc_psize].sllp) {
 		get_paca()->vmalloc_sllp =
 			mmu_psize_defs[mmu_vmalloc_psize].sllp;
-		slb_flush_and_rebolt();
+		slb_vmalloc_update();
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */
 
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-ozlabs.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
+++ linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static inline unsigned long mk_vsid_data
 	return (get_kernel_vsid(ea) << SLB_VSID_SHIFT) | flags;
 }
 
-static inline void slb_shadow_update(unsigned long esid, unsigned long vsid,
+static inline void slb_shadow_update(unsigned long ea,
+				     unsigned long flags,
 				     unsigned long entry)
 {
 	/*
@@ -61,11 +62,11 @@ static inline void slb_shadow_update(uns
 	 * updating it.
 	 */
 	get_slb_shadow()->save_area[entry].esid = 0;
-	barrier();
-	get_slb_shadow()->save_area[entry].vsid = vsid;
-	barrier();
-	get_slb_shadow()->save_area[entry].esid = esid;
-
+	smp_wmb();
+	get_slb_shadow()->save_area[entry].vsid = mk_vsid_data(ea, flags);
+	smp_wmb();
+	get_slb_shadow()->save_area[entry].esid = mk_esid_data(ea, entry);
+	smp_wmb();
 }
 
 static inline void create_shadowed_slbe(unsigned long ea, unsigned long flags,
@@ -76,8 +77,7 @@ static inline void create_shadowed_slbe(
 	 * we don't get a stale entry here if we get preempted by PHYP
 	 * between these two statements.
 	 */
-	slb_shadow_update(mk_esid_data(ea, entry), mk_vsid_data(ea, flags),
-			  entry);
+	slb_shadow_update(ea, flags, entry);
 
 	asm volatile("slbmte  %0,%1" :
 		     : "r" (mk_vsid_data(ea, flags)),
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ void slb_flush_and_rebolt(void)
 		ksp_esid_data &= ~SLB_ESID_V;
 
 	/* Only third entry (stack) may change here so only resave that */
-	slb_shadow_update(ksp_esid_data,
-			  mk_vsid_data(ksp_esid_data, lflags), 2);
+	slb_shadow_update(get_paca()->kstack, lflags, 2);
 
 	/* We need to do this all in asm, so we're sure we don't touch
 	 * the stack between the slbia and rebolting it. */
@@ -123,6 +122,15 @@ void slb_flush_and_rebolt(void)
 		     : "memory");
 }
 
+void slb_vmalloc_update(void)
+{
+	unsigned long vflags;
+
+	vflags = SLB_VSID_KERNEL | mmu_psize_defs[mmu_vmalloc_psize].sllp;
+	slb_shadow_update(VMALLOC_START, vflags, 1);
+	slb_flush_and_rebolt();
+}
+
 /* Flush all user entries from the segment table of the current processor. */
 void switch_slb(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/include/asm-powerpc/mmu-hash64.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-ozlabs.orig/include/asm-powerpc/mmu-hash64.h
+++ linux-2.6-ozlabs/include/asm-powerpc/mmu-hash64.h
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ extern void slb_initialize(void);
 extern void slb_flush_and_rebolt(void);
 extern void stab_initialize(unsigned long stab);
 
+extern void slb_vmalloc_update(void);
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-03  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-01  4:56 [PATCH] fixes for the SLB shadow buffer Michael Neuling
2007-08-01  5:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-08-01  6:02   ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-01 21:48     ` Will Schmidt
2007-08-02  5:56       ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-02  7:31         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-02  8:56           ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-02  8:58             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-02  9:03               ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-02  9:14                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-02  9:28                   ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-03  1:55                     ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2007-08-03  2:50                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-01 22:33     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-01 23:32       ` Michael Neuling
2007-08-02  0:05         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-02  1:04           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1158.1186106139@neuling.org \
    --to=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).