From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hollis@penguinppc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bootwrapper: add flat device tree support code
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@penguinppc.org>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
In-Reply-To: <1157995667.27129.148.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>
References: <20060908034623.GG5203@mag.az.mvista.com>
	<1157726787.26967.7.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com>
	<1157995667.27129.148.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:44:05 -0500
Message-Id: <1158000245.24546.24.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 12:27 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> 
> Wasn't there a notion of even combining this with
> the DTC code base directly?  I haven't seen any
> patches or motion down this line, though...?

That's certainly a good place the new code could be applied. Of course,
I haven't sent patches to uboot, iseries boot code, kexec, or any other
number of places either, and don't really plan to. If those areas have
problems, they can switch to the consolidated codebase then (rather than
bugfixing the non-consolidated code).

Why, are you going to convert DTC?

-Hollis