From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9C867C2A for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:38:36 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Nicholas Miell In-Reply-To: <1159840091.2349.0.camel@entropy> References: <20061002214954.GD665@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20061002234428.GE3278@stusta.de> <20061003012241.GF3278@stusta.de> <1159840091.2349.0.camel@entropy> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:37:40 +1000 Message-Id: <1159850260.5482.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Judith Lebzelter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Won't this also cause warnings for valid arch-specific usage (i.e. in > linux/arch/{i386,x86_64})? I wouldn't cause that usage valid :) Ben.