From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (unknown [81.2.110.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B0867BF7 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:05:24 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386 From: Alan Cox To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1159850260.5482.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061002214954.GD665@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20061002234428.GE3278@stusta.de> <20061003012241.GF3278@stusta.de> <1159840091.2349.0.camel@entropy> <1159850260.5482.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:29:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1159874975.17553.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Nicholas Miell , Judith Lebzelter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ar Maw, 2006-10-03 am 14:37 +1000, ysgrifennodd Benjamin Herrenschmidt: > > Won't this also cause warnings for valid arch-specific usage (i.e. in > > linux/arch/{i386,x86_64})? > > I wouldn't cause that usage valid :) Actually a lot of the older legitimate users (DRM/AGP) have been cleaned up so it might be worth doing now after all. Ok I take back the NAK having looked deeper. We appear to have made sufficient progress along the way. Acked-by: Alan Cox