From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Steve Munroe <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Bailey <jbailey@ubuntu.com>,
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@ubuntu.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Ben Collins <ben.collins@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: glibc-2.5 test suite hangs/crashes the machine
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:22:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162423331.25682.480.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF1858F563.F89FF725-ON86257219.007D5B13-86257219.007E0EB5@us.ibm.com>
> So I need to delay __ASSUME_SET_ROBUST_LIST to 2.6.18 for __powerpc__ ?
The problem is not so much the headers you build with than the runtime
checks... I suppose you shouldn't bother as we are trickling down the
fixes to distros & stable series anyway.
> What about __ASSUME_FUTEX_LOCK_PI ?
I don't know, I'm very unfamiliar with that futex stuff. I need to look
more closely.
> > - kernel 2.6.18 and current git until yesterday (fix got in today) has
> > a bug if you manage to pass a wrong futex with a non-aligned atomic
> > value, it will possibly oops the kernel. With the fix, it will return an
> > error.
> >
> > Now what seems to be a glibc issue:
> >
> > - I've had the tst-robustpi# tests (in fact the very first one, I
> > haven't tested the others) die on me with a SIGBUS caused by glibc
> > trying to do a lwarx/starx. on an odd address.
> >
> Rayn reminded me of a bug where the new robust code did not account for the
> fact that the TID was not at the same place as i386. I think Ryan has a
> patch.
Ah ok. Can you give me the details as soon as you get them ? (In
addition to submitting the fix upstream of course :) ubuntu at least is
starting to build their next distro on top of glibc-2.5 so it would be
nice if they had the fix asap.
Thanks for looking at this !
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-01 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-27 5:56 glibc-2.5 test suite hangs/crashes the machine Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-27 16:22 ` Jeff Bailey
2006-10-30 1:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-01 22:17 ` Steve Munroe
2006-11-01 22:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-01 22:56 ` Steve Munroe
2006-11-01 23:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-10-30 3:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-30 11:35 ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-30 20:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-31 6:37 ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-31 6:51 ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-31 9:47 ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-31 20:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-31 20:44 ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1162423331.25682.480.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ben.collins@ubuntu.com \
--cc=fabbione@ubuntu.com \
--cc=jbailey@ubuntu.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sjmunroe@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).