linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Steve Munroe <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Bailey <jbailey@ubuntu.com>,
	Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@ubuntu.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Ben Collins <ben.collins@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: glibc-2.5 test suite hangs/crashes the machine
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:22:11 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162423331.25682.480.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF1858F563.F89FF725-ON86257219.007D5B13-86257219.007E0EB5@us.ibm.com>


> So I need to delay __ASSUME_SET_ROBUST_LIST to 2.6.18 for __powerpc__ ?

The problem is not so much the headers you build with than the runtime
checks... I suppose you shouldn't bother as we are trickling down the
fixes to distros & stable series anyway.

> What about __ASSUME_FUTEX_LOCK_PI ?

I don't know, I'm very unfamiliar with that futex stuff. I need to look
more closely.

> >  - kernel 2.6.18 and current git until yesterday (fix got in today) has
> > a bug if you manage to pass a wrong futex with a non-aligned atomic
> > value, it will possibly oops the kernel. With the fix, it will return an
> > error.
> >
> > Now what seems to be a glibc issue:
> >
> >  - I've had the tst-robustpi# tests (in fact the very first one, I
> > haven't tested the others) die on me with a SIGBUS caused by glibc
> > trying to do a lwarx/starx. on an odd address.
> >
> Rayn reminded me of a bug where the new robust code did not account for the
> fact that the TID was not at the same place as i386. I think Ryan has a
> patch.

Ah ok. Can you give me the details as soon as you get them ? (In
addition to submitting the fix upstream of course :) ubuntu at least is
starting to build their next distro on top of glibc-2.5 so it would be
nice if they had the fix asap.

Thanks for looking at this !

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-01 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-27  5:56 glibc-2.5 test suite hangs/crashes the machine Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-27 16:22 ` Jeff Bailey
2006-10-30  1:47   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-01 22:17     ` Steve Munroe
2006-11-01 22:35       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-01 22:56         ` Steve Munroe
2006-11-01 23:22           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-10-30  3:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-30 11:35   ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-30 20:36     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-31  6:37       ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-31  6:51       ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-31  9:47       ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2006-10-31 20:30         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-31 20:44           ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1162423331.25682.480.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ben.collins@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=fabbione@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=jbailey@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sjmunroe@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).