From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>, Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: ppc32 PIO recovery mecanism
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:20:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162776047.28571.268.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162775915.3415.2.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 09:18 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 11:41 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On 32 bits powerpc, we currently have a mechanism where we try to
> > recover from machine checks happening on PIO operations (inb/outb/....).
> > This mecanisms has proven of dubious reliability in the past and it's my
> > understanding that we've pretty fixed all relevant legacy drivers that
> > distro typically load so that they don't muck around when they
> > shouldn't.
> >
> > I'm currently merging 32 and 64 bits io.h and I would really like to
> > just get rid of that stuff, but I'd like your distro point of view
> > first. Is this mechanism still useful at all or not ?
>
> Yes, I think it's still useful because there are some drivers which
> aren't update to use check_legacy_ioport() (or whatever other system)
> yet.
>
> Not many, mind you -- but I'd like to be 100% sure before we drop it.
> Let's start by making it print with KERN_CRIT instead of KERN_DEBUG?
We should rate limit if we do that tho... Some drivers will just totally
flood you.
I'll keep it around for now.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-06 0:41 ppc32 PIO recovery mecanism Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-06 1:18 ` David Woodhouse
2006-11-06 1:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-11-06 6:11 ` Olaf Hering
2006-11-06 6:24 ` David Woodhouse
2006-11-06 6:25 ` Olaf Hering
2006-11-09 18:33 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1162776047.28571.268.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).