From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (e2.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e2.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D438567C26 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:12:01 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kA6MBq1p023710 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:11:52 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id kA6MBqAC228328 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:11:52 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kA6MBpOT021023 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:11:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC: remove broken vsyscall code From: john stultz To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1162849587.28571.356.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200611062359.10404.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <1162849587.28571.356.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:09:27 -0800 Message-Id: <1162850967.29826.62.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, tglx@linutronix.de, greg.weeks@timesys.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 08:46 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 23:59 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Remove vsyscalls that were broken by the PowerPC generic TOD patch, also > > fixing the build breakage due to its bad rebase. > > > > The patch has been tested on PPC32 only. I had to preserve the data that > > are made visible to userland via /proc/ppc64/systemcfg on PPC64, however > > now there are only zeroes there and their affect isn't known to me... > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > There is simply no way this will happen ! I believe this is just a short-term fix so the ppc tod/rt code can be tested. I do plan on getting the ppc vsyscall working before we push any ppc tod changes to mainline. thanks -john