Re: ipr SATA support is causing problems

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 17:56 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > How hard would it be to make the SATA bits conditionally compiled in,
> > depending on CONFIG_ATA?
> 
> I took a look at doing this. It got a bit messy with a bunch of ifdefs,
> then I realized that doing this would break module dependencies. If
> ipr does not depend on CONFIG_ATA, then libata will not automatically
> get loaded (or built into initrd's) when ipr is needed.
> 
> The best way I can see to accomplish your desired goal is to do something
> like the fusion driver did and separate out the sas bits from the scsi
> bits and essentially end up with multiple ipr modules. Unfortunately,
> this is not 2.6.19 material, but I could start working on it if you
> thought it sounded like a reasonable direction.

Yeah, something like

                    /--- SATA sub-modules (depends on CONFIG_ATA)
 - core IPR module /
                   \
                    \--- SAS sub-module (depends on CONFIG_SCSI)
                     \ 
                      \--- SCSI sub-module (depends on CONFIG_SCSI)


Or do you need SAS and SATA to be one and only one ?

Cheers,
Ben.