From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/7] Powerpc MSI Implementation
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:05:31 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1163397931.7410.86.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FF34858D-1D40-4B5E-9B49-D6B9476D66DB@kernel.crashing.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1564 bytes --]
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 08:36 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Looking closer most of them are 5 bits, the high 5 bits, and happen to
> > sit next to reserved fields (which must be zero), so reading the byte
> > should work in practice. But for a few of them you'll get cruft in the
> > low bits.
> >
> > I don't know what they were thinking when they decided to have 3 and 5
> > bit capability fields, and then specify some of them as being a byte
> > wide as well. Perhaps the spec committee had a big night out ;)
> >
> > I was going to write a generic version of pci_find_ht_capability() (as
> > suggested by Segher), so along with that I'll clean up the #defines to
> > just be the 3 or 5 bit capability codes, and then have a shift for
> > getting the capability out of the byte.
> >
> > Users will still need to know if they're looking for a 3 or 5 bit
> > capability, but we can encapsulate that in pci_find_ht_capability()
> > and
> > hopefully most people won't have to see the difference.
>
> Keep the defines the full 8 bits and put all the knowledge
> about which bits are relevant into pci_find_ht_capability()?
> If you do shifting you can get clashes (say, 0b00110 vs. 0b110),
> and this would make for simpler code, too.
That's what I did .. I think? :)
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-13 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-07 7:21 [RFC/PATCH 0/7] Powerpc MSI Implementation Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/7] Add #defines for Hypertransport MSI fields Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 8:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07 7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/7] Make some MSI-X #defines generic Michael Ellerman
2006-11-13 18:31 ` patch pci-make-some-msi-x-defines-generic.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2006-11-07 7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/7] Rip out the existing powerpc msi stubs Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/7] Powerpc MSI implementation Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 20:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-07 20:14 ` Russell King
2006-11-07 20:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 20:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-07 20:48 ` Russell King
2006-11-07 21:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-07 22:25 ` Russell King
2006-11-07 22:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 23:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08 0:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-08 1:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08 2:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-08 2:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08 3:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 20:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/7] RTAS " Michael Ellerman
2006-11-08 20:16 ` Jake Moilanen
2006-11-08 23:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/7] MPIC MSI backend Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 8:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07 8:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 9:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07 9:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 11:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07 7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 7/7] Enable MSI on Powerpc Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 7:41 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/7] Powerpc MSI Implementation Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 8:02 ` Greg KH
2006-11-08 5:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-11-08 10:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08 23:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-11-09 7:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-13 6:05 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1163397931.7410.86.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).