From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net
	[192.88.158.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F7A67D2C
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:12 +1100 (EST)
Received: from az33smr01 (az33smr01.freescale.net [10.64.34.199])
	by az33egw01.freescale.net (8.12.11/az33egw01) with ESMTP id
	kAE5wBua021334
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:58:11 -0700 (MST)
Received: from zch01exm23.fsl.freescale.net (zch01exm23.ap.freescale.net
	[10.192.129.207])
	by az33smr01 (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id kAE5w5tw018390
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:58:07 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Powerpc: Make pci_read_irq_line the default:
	onmpc7448hpc2 board
From: Zang Roy-r61911 <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
In-Reply-To: <1163483152.5940.106.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1161141538.24931.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1161949906.25263.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1161960682.25801.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1163482111.3748.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1163483152.5940.106.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1163483929.4068.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 14 Nov 2006 13:58:49 +0800
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Alexandre.Bounine@tundra.com" <Alexandre.Bounine@tundra.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 13:45, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Good. Same comments as with Vitaly though :-)
> 
Sorry, I do not noticed your previous comment on Vitaly :-).
Roy