From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] powerpc: Do not use op_model_cell under LPAR
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:51:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1165963871.21287.3.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612122055.59698.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1001 bytes --]
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 20:55 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 December 2006 05:13, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 13:02 +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > > op_model_cell supports native Cell processor. Under LPAR environment,
> > > it cannot work.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kou Ishizaki <kou.ishizaki.co.jp>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
>
> >
> > Is FW_FEATURE_LPAR is the right switch to use here, I'm not sure.
>
> Yes, I think it is. The code accesses I/O memory areas that can not
> work under any hypervisor, so FW_FEATURE_LPAR makes perfect sense
> to me.
Yeah it's good enough.
But to be pedantic, P (LPAR) implies Q (HV), but !P does not imply !Q :)
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-12 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-12 4:02 [PATCH 12/15] powerpc: Do not use op_model_cell under LPAR Ishizaki Kou
2006-12-12 4:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-12-12 4:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-12 4:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-12-12 11:49 ` Ishizaki Kou
2006-12-12 19:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-12-12 22:51 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1165963871.21287.3.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).