From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (crystal.sipsolutions.net [195.210.38.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7548C67BCD for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:13:24 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: fix comment in kernel/irq.c From: Johannes Berg To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: <20061213123945.859071000@sipsolutions.net>> References: <20061213123819.403286000@sipsolutions.net> > <20061213123945.859071000@sipsolutions.net>> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Gws3XRP00KS/eloGuLdx" Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:13:12 +0100 Message-Id: <1166015592.7273.8.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-Gws3XRP00KS/eloGuLdx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:38 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > kernel/irq.c contains a comment that speaks of -1 and -2 as interrupt > numbers, but this is actually dependent on configuration options now. > Replace by NO_IRQ and NO_IRQ_ENABLED. Humm, this got into this patchset by accident. That doesn't really make it wrong though :) johannes --=-Gws3XRP00KS/eloGuLdx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBFf/xo/ETPhpq3jKURAhnHAJ9yliNTQmaaq2lT2fdPxKHFqRVynACgnLA8 cD1VLprK7SAcdW9pneDx65c= =enq4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Gws3XRP00KS/eloGuLdx--