From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omta01.suddenlink.net (omta01-pub.suddenlink.net [208.180.40.73]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114F367BEF for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:46:30 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/14] Spidernet add net_ratelimit to suppress long output From: Jim Lewis To: michael@ellerman.id.au In-Reply-To: <1166052679.6838.1.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20061213210010.GR4329@austin.ibm.com> <20061213210825.GB1915@austin.ibm.com> <1166052679.6838.1.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:13:19 -0600 Message-Id: <1166076799.21877.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jens Osterkamp , jgarzik@pobox.com Reply-To: jim@jklewis.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , It is in the LTC Bugzilla. I just checked and it is still there :) Jim On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:31 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 15:08 -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote: > > This patch adds net_ratelimit to many of the printks in order to > > limit extraneous warning messages (created in response to Bug 28554). > > Bug 28554 in which bug tracking system? I can't find it in LTC or > kernel.org bugzilla. > > cheers >