From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (crystal.sipsolutions.net [195.210.38.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A10DDE41 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:29:34 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: fix comment in kernel/irq.c From: Johannes Berg To: Paul Mackerras In-Reply-To: <17799.31574.736052.865096@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20061213123819.403286000@sipsolutions.net> <20061213123945.859071000@sipsolutions.net> <17799.31574.736052.865096@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bi3zkOKh5v5mnIRghAXt" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:29:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1166552974.6916.0.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-bi3zkOKh5v5mnIRghAXt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 16:40 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Johannes Berg writes: >=20 > > kernel/irq.c contains a comment that speaks of -1 and -2 as interrupt > > numbers, but this is actually dependent on configuration options now. > > Replace by NO_IRQ and NO_IRQ_ENABLED. >=20 > Hmmm, NO_IRQ has to be 0, if anything, per decree of the head penguin. I thought so too but then I found that under some conditions it's actually defined to -1, so I was confused. Maybe that is wrong then? johannes --=-bi3zkOKh5v5mnIRghAXt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBFiC+O/ETPhpq3jKURAs9yAKCD+uYC8w+RXhZM1go9zQhuNOHbPQCgm1Nd nelyB4QTARNQ4S4n42cGRTY= =BkxK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bi3zkOKh5v5mnIRghAXt--