Re: [PATCH] Fix Maple PATA IRQ assignment.

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 21:43 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 21:34 +0000, Alan wrote:
> > > Er, that would be pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(), which is what I _have_ used.
> > 
> > Ok un-NAK that, I didn't realise there was a wrapper to those methods too.
> > 
> > > As I said, the Maple board is the _only_ user, across all architectures
> > > and all PowerPC platforms, of pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(). And the AMD74xx
> > 
> > The Motorola's also used to use funny IRQ numbers for IDE legacy - or are
> > they no longer supported
> 
> Well, there's no other implementation of pci_get_legacy_ide_irq() (other
> than the default {15,14}) except for Maple, throughout all of arch/ppc
> and arch/powerpc.

Some other platforms may have hacked the drivers instead ... I added
pci_get_legacy_ide_irq() when doing Maple support but I didn't go back
to see if drivers had existing hacks that needed fixing to use it too.

In fact, some platforms in arch/ppc might even still use the old
deprecated trick of hooking the hwif init from IDE to setup the ports
addresses and irq.
 
> > > driver is the only driver which calls it -- for Maple. Hence the
> > > suggestion that perhaps there's a better way to do it.
> > 
> > IRQ routing is platform not driver. Let's keep it that way.
> 
> Well, yes -- that's what my patch does. I was just thinking that since
> this is the _only_ platform which currently uses it, it might be worth
> fixing it differently -- by changing the platform setup code to either
> route the interrupts to match what the generic code expects, or switch
> the controller to native mode.
> 
> I'm happy enough with the patch I sent too though.

I prefer keeping this approach too. There have been cases in the past
where legacy IDE IRQs had to be remapped and I prefer having a clear
nice hook to do it properly. Even if there's only one user (in fact more
than one are there are more than one users of the maple platform :-) for
now, at least, it 'shows' the right way to do.

Ben.