From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparsemem on Cell (take 3) From: John Rose To: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061215165335.61D9F775@localhost.localdomain> <200612182354.47685.arnd@arndb.de> <1166483780.8648.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200612190959.47344.arnd@arndb.de> <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1168059162.23226.1.camel@sinatra.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:52:42 -0600 Cc: Andrew Morton , mkravetz@us.ibm.com, Arnd Bergmann , linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml , hch@infradead.org, External List , Paul Mackerras , kmannth@us.ibm.com, gone@us.ibm.com, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > I dropped this on the floor over Christmas. This has had a few smoke > tests on ppc64 and i386 and is ready for -mm. Against 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. Could this break ia64, given that it uses memmap_init_zone()?