From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Christian Rund <Christian.Rund@de.ibm.com>,
Murali N Iyer <mniyer@us.ibm.com>,
Hartmut Penner <HPENNER@de.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: EMAC OF binding....
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:49:26 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1170125366.26655.313.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170121832.26655.301.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 12:50 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Does emac really vary that much between the chips its in? I know
> > chatting with Ben that axon did some evil things, but how much
> > difference exists on 4xx implementations?
>
> They all seem to have subtle differences, which is why I want the actual
> chip to be the first entry in the compatible property.
Note that the goal here is not to have different drivers bind on it, but
more to allow to use device_is_compatible() and/or use the void * data
of the probe list as a feature bits field.
Ben.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-30 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <OF7EF2F643.75F7008B-ON8625725D.00157658-8625725D.00167CB4@au1.ibm.com>
2007-01-08 6:09 ` EMAC OF binding Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-08 6:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-08 20:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-08 22:12 ` David Gibson
2007-01-08 23:34 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-08 22:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-08 22:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-08 23:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-09 0:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09 16:08 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-09 21:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09 21:57 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-09 22:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09 22:17 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-09 22:41 ` David Gibson
2007-01-09 22:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09 23:05 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-30 0:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-30 0:45 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-30 0:54 ` David Gibson
2007-01-30 1:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-30 2:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1170125366.26655.313.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Christian.Rund@de.ibm.com \
--cc=HPENNER@de.ibm.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mniyer@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).