From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C7CDDE43 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:07:22 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: mac-address vs. local-mac-address From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Timur Tabi In-Reply-To: <45CA47AB.1000302@freescale.com> References: <45CA41F7.6020700@freescale.com> <1170883956.2620.305.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45CA47AB.1000302@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:07:12 +1100 Message-Id: <1170886032.2620.309.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Without a firmware device tree, there's no way to update the device tree and > have that new tree retained over a reboot. I don't think it was ever question to update it over reboot... mac-address is a runtime property that is lost at reboot, at least that's my understanding of the OF behaviour. That's where your confusion is. Ben.