From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc: Add support for AMCC Taishan 440GX eval board From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jon Loeliger In-Reply-To: References: <200702121129.05004.sr@denx.de> <1171281988.20192.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171310108.20192.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:23:22 +1100 Message-Id: <1171311802.20192.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Roland Dreier , Stefan Roese , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:16 -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > So, like, the other day Benjamin Herrenschmidt mumbled: > > > > Note that there are still things that we might want to change. For > > example, I think we really should look into adding a macro mecanism > > and/or an include mecanism to dtc so that we can do things like #include > > to get the base processor/SoC definition and then > > "overlay" some properties on top of it (like emac phy mode etc...) > > What do people prefer here? Straight CPP pre-run? CPP pre-run has issue, notably due to the usage of "#" in property names. > Direct support built into dtc to do file-inclusion, macros? We aren't sure yet, though David might have ideas. > Thoughts, opinions, suggestions, pre-NACKs, Cabernet Franc bribes? I'd take the later :-) Ben.