From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] zImage: Cleanup and improve zImage entry point From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Geoff Levand In-Reply-To: <45D9BEC0.1060909@am.sony.com> References: <20070216062739.6DFDBDDD05@ozlabs.org> <45D7AA50.3090408@am.sony.com> <20070218072310.GB1859@localhost.localdomain> <45D9BEC0.1060909@am.sony.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:59:40 +1100 Message-Id: <1171915180.18571.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > I think the better idea is to make the generic bootwrapper code support > SMP. I don't see any fundamental reason why it can't. The trouble here > is that your BSS stack is really not a proper way, that's why it doesn't > work. > > I'll put something together that provides generic (SMP) stack support > for the bootwrapper. I'll be away the end of this week and next week, > so I don't know when I'll be able to post it. As I said earlier, I see no reason why the wrapper needs to provide a stack for non-primary CPUs. Ben.