From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (crystal.sipsolutions.net [195.210.38.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3434CDDDEE for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:41:18 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Front LED on Mac mini G4 From: Johannes Berg To: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <200702201835.14882.florian.fainelli@int-evry.fr> References: <200702201433.12851.florian.fainelli@int-evry.fr> <1171987020.15489.177.camel@johannes.berg> <200702201835.14882.florian.fainelli@int-evry.fr> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wM6xLXJVzZy1p35v0Jkj" Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:41:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1171993265.15489.211.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-wM6xLXJVzZy1p35v0Jkj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 18:35 +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote: > It is a PowerMac10,1. After bypassing some device checks in via_pmu_led_i= nit,=20 > I tried : echo 0 > /sys/class/leds/pmu-front-led/brightness >=20 > which resulted in : PMU: bad reply len 85 and the brightness not changed = of=20 > course. Hm, ok. > the check is in via-pmu.c line 1500 >=20 > Do you know what could cause this reply ? No, I don't really know the PMU that well. johannes --=-wM6xLXJVzZy1p35v0Jkj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBF2zKx/ETPhpq3jKURAursAKCGKjdWCEYiaeaLzHeonGf2f2KI6wCdHDlQ lN4mF1QHJy5AziK3RdHFBng= =9azh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wM6xLXJVzZy1p35v0Jkj--