linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrice Bouchand <pb_fwd_list@yahoo.fr>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: mcpu options for AMCC440 with fpu
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:47:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1172087270.3018.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <600461.55072.qm@web23412.mail.ird.yahoo.com>


FYI, I got the following answer on mplayer mailing list:

> Apparently -mcpu=440fp is the one. However, it's possible, that GCC
> "optimizations" actually make the code slower.

Can someone confirme this possiblity ?

Any answer would be greatly appreciated ;) 


    Patrice Bouchand


> Hello,
> 
>    I was searching for the best mcpu option for amcc440, compiling and
> running a small program you can find here: 
> http://magnux.free.fr/gcc/mandelbrot.c. My distro is a ppc fedora core
> 6, and results are obviously the same using DENX4.0.
> 
> --------------------
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> 
> real    1m15.059s
> user    1m14.996s
> sys     0m0.060s
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> 
> real    0m39.606s
> user    0m39.552s
> sys     0m0.028s
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> 
> real    1m15.016s
> user    1m14.988s
> sys     0m0.024s
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -msoft-float ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> 
> real    0m39.577s
> user    0m39.544s
> sys     0m0.032s
> --------------------
> 
> * I do not explain why not using FPU gives better results ?
> 
> * I did also a test with bzip2.c
> ( http://pag.csail.mit.edu/~smcc/projects/single-file-programs/bzip2.c ).
> 
> ----------------------
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 && time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c
> && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> 
> real    0m18.478s
> user    0m18.216s
> sys     0m0.152s
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> 
> real    0m18.786s
> user    0m18.544s
> sys     0m0.128s
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> 
> real    0m18.811s
> user    0m18.548s
> sys     0m0.144s
> -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=G3 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> 
> real    0m18.871s
> user    0m18.644s
> sys     0m0.104s
> ----------------------
> 
> * mcpu option seems to not have any effect ?
> 
> *  My third test was to compile and run mplayer.
> - With default options (no mcpu specified), my test mpeg was smooth.
> - With mcpu=440fp, my test mpeg was not smooth.
> 
>  Can anybody bring me some lights about the right gcc mcpu option for
> amcc440 ?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>        Patrice Bouchand
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
> questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des
> expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses.
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-21 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-19  8:45 mcpu options for AMCC440 with fpu Patrice Bouchand
2007-02-21 19:47 ` Patrice Bouchand [this message]
2007-02-21 21:35   ` Magnus Hjorth
2007-02-22  6:57     ` RE : " Patrice Bouchand
2007-02-23 22:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-24  6:44   ` Patrice Bouchand
2007-02-24 20:20     ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1172087270.3018.18.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=pb_fwd_list@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).