From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: RE: [PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A597F5@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> References: <200702212325.l1LNPBwL007793@ld0164-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070222011811.GA18364@localhost.localdomain> <45b623f395654fc4f4920b9553794def@kernel.crashing.org> <20070222103410.GB11014@localhost.localdomain> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A592C7@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> <259dc2545888e6588a8a0707ad2e84b0@kernel.crashing.org> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A59732@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> <1fb51bd63da9a7de836f3037908be52e@kernel.crashing.org> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A597F5@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 07:42:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1172299329.1902.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Maybe: > interrupts = < a 1 4 b 1 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 > > interrupt-parents = <&UIC0 &UIC0 &UIC1 &UIC1 &UIC1> > > You don't know how many cells per interrupt until you traverse up to > the interrupt parent. > > I understand some properties only make sense together, but only > can be parsed together seems ugly. That's already the case with interrupt-map's anyway. I don't have a firm preference between the options of interrupt-array and interrupt-parents, they both have strenghts, though I tend to grow on segher's approach here. Ben.