From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0384BDDF90 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:28:45 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: Optional TX/RX path optimized for SMP From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: References: <200702231730.58579.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:28:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1172910508.8184.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Thomas Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , Christoph Raisch , linux-ppc , Marcus Eder , Stefan Roscher List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 04:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Jan-Bernd Themann writes: > > > > Are there any concerns about this approach? > > Yes. You should fix the NAPI code instead of trying to work > around it. NAPI is being fixed but the fix will take time to get in. In the meantime, the solution to get something working is the workaround. Ben.