linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: mohan@in.ibm.com
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	fastboot@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:37:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1173202634.4675.37.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070306165529.GD7476@in.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2196 bytes --]

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:25 +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:16:55PM +0100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 19:27 +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Here comes the revised version of patch to fix the interrupt missing
> > > problem when a kdump kernel is booted with "maxcpus=1" kernel parameter.
> > > 
> > > In the xics initialization code a check is made to detemine whether
> > > maxcpus kernel parameter is present and if its present then
> > > default_distrib_server variable is initialized to the current boot cpu
> > > id (by default_server variable). So that when ever a kernel is booted
> > > with maxcpus kernel parameter all interrupts are routed to the boot cpu
> > > only.
> > > 
> > > Tested on POWER5 and JS20 systems.
> > 
> > First, I don't know why we keep telling people to use maxcpus=1 for
> > kexec/kdump - it's causing bugs, and I don't know of any that it fixes?
> 
> Some distros want to use maxcpus=1 for kdump.

Yeah OK.

> > Second, the way you've written this is not so good. The xics code should
> > not be checking that "maxcpus" exists on the command line, it should be
> > checking that the distrib server points to a cpu that is online - using
> > cpu_online() etc.
> >
> 
> In get_irq_server function in xics.c, "noirqdistrib" command line
> parameter is indirectly checked for routing the interrupts either to a
> specific cpu or to all cpus. So I think checking for maxcpus= command
> line parameter in xics.c is not a problem.

No, it checks a flag, it doesn't run strstr on the saved command line.

> Also during the xics_init_IRQ function other cpus (secondary cpus) will
> not be online, they are made online at a later stage. So using
> cpu_online() function at xics_init_IRQ will return true only for boot
> cpu id.

OK, so you should be able to use cpus possible map or something similar.

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-06 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-08  4:55 [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970 Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18  4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18  5:14   ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 10:57   ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 11:42     ` [Fastboot] " Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 15:07       ` Doug Maxey
2007-03-06 13:57     ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 14:16       ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 16:55         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 17:37           ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2007-03-07  4:53             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 10:52               ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-09  8:57                 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10  7:06                   ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-10 12:54                     ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 16:59                     ` Milton Miller
2007-04-11  1:16                       ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-19 11:52                         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-20  5:45                           ` Milton Miller
2007-04-26  9:24                             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-26 14:42                               ` Milton Miller
2007-05-03 14:47                                 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-05-06  6:52                                   ` Milton Miller
2007-06-04 10:54                                     ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-06  9:43                                       ` Milton Miller
2007-06-06 11:31                                         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-11  1:58                                           ` Milton Miller
2007-06-11 18:07                                             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-12 14:51                                             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-15 16:35                                               ` Milton Miller
2007-03-07  6:06         ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2007-03-07 10:46           ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 22:05       ` Nathan Lynch
2007-03-07  5:01         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07  8:52         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-07  9:10           ` Mohan Kumar M

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1173202634.4675.37.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).