From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
fastboot@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:46:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1173264391.5101.44.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070307060623.GA5469@in.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1912 bytes --]
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 11:36 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:16:55PM +0100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 19:27 +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here comes the revised version of patch to fix the interrupt missing
> > > problem when a kdump kernel is booted with "maxcpus=1" kernel parameter.
> > >
> > > In the xics initialization code a check is made to detemine whether
> > > maxcpus kernel parameter is present and if its present then
> > > default_distrib_server variable is initialized to the current boot cpu
> > > id (by default_server variable). So that when ever a kernel is booted
> > > with maxcpus kernel parameter all interrupts are routed to the boot cpu
> > > only.
> > >
> > > Tested on POWER5 and JS20 systems.
> >
> > First, I don't know why we keep telling people to use maxcpus=1 for
> > kexec/kdump - it's causing bugs, and I don't know of any that it fixes?
> >
>
> Logically speaking, there is no need to bring up all the cpus in the
> system to capture the dump. A single cpu can do the job, may be in
> relatively lesser memory. Just because we see bugs with maxcpus=1, does
> not mean we should try to bring up all the cpus in second kernel. I think
> we should try to clean maxcpus=1 path instead.
Sure it'd be nice. But in reality I think the memory reductions are
miniscule, it's still an SMP kernel, it still allocates per-cpu data for
every cpu, they're still spinning. The only thing that maxcpus does is
not bring them online ... and cause lots of bugs.
But the distros have made the call, so I'll just shutup now :)
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-07 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-08 4:55 [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970 Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18 5:14 ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 10:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 11:42 ` [Fastboot] " Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 15:07 ` Doug Maxey
2007-03-06 13:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 14:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 16:55 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 17:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-07 4:53 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 10:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-09 8:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 7:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-10 12:54 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 16:59 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-11 1:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-19 11:52 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-20 5:45 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-26 9:24 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-26 14:42 ` Milton Miller
2007-05-03 14:47 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-05-06 6:52 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-04 10:54 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-06 9:43 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-06 11:31 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-11 1:58 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-11 18:07 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-12 14:51 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-15 16:35 ` Milton Miller
2007-03-07 6:06 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2007-03-07 10:46 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2007-03-06 22:05 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-03-07 5:01 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-07 9:10 ` Mohan Kumar M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1173264391.5101.44.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).