From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: mohan@in.ibm.com
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
fastboot@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:52:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1173264752.5101.49.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070307045341.GG7476@in.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2112 bytes --]
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 10:23 +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:37:14PM +0100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:25 +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:16:55PM +0100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > First, I don't know why we keep telling people to use maxcpus=1 for
> > > > kexec/kdump - it's causing bugs, and I don't know of any that it fixes?
> > >
> > > Some distros want to use maxcpus=1 for kdump.
> >
> > Yeah OK.
> >
> > > > Second, the way you've written this is not so good. The xics code should
> > > > not be checking that "maxcpus" exists on the command line, it should be
> > > > checking that the distrib server points to a cpu that is online - using
> > > > cpu_online() etc.
> > > >
> > >
> > > In get_irq_server function in xics.c, "noirqdistrib" command line
> > > parameter is indirectly checked for routing the interrupts either to a
> > > specific cpu or to all cpus. So I think checking for maxcpus= command
> > > line parameter in xics.c is not a problem.
> >
> > No, it checks a flag, it doesn't run strstr on the saved command line.
> >
> What if I use a flag (or existing global variable if any) to check for
> the presence of maxcpus kernel paramter?
There's already maxcpus in init/main.c, that would probably be better,
though still ugly.
> > > Also during the xics_init_IRQ function other cpus (secondary cpus) will
> > > not be online, they are made online at a later stage. So using
> > > cpu_online() function at xics_init_IRQ will return true only for boot
> > > cpu id.
> >
> > OK, so you should be able to use cpus possible map or something similar.
> >
> Hmm, I think cpus possible map will have an entry for the offline cpu
> also.
You're right, it will, did I mention that maxcpus= is broken :)
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-07 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-08 4:55 [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970 Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18 5:14 ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 10:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 11:42 ` [Fastboot] " Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 15:07 ` Doug Maxey
2007-03-06 13:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 14:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 16:55 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 17:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-07 4:53 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 10:52 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2007-04-09 8:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 7:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-10 12:54 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 16:59 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-11 1:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-19 11:52 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-20 5:45 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-26 9:24 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-26 14:42 ` Milton Miller
2007-05-03 14:47 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-05-06 6:52 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-04 10:54 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-06 9:43 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-06 11:31 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-11 1:58 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-11 18:07 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-12 14:51 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-15 16:35 ` Milton Miller
2007-03-07 6:06 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2007-03-07 10:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 22:05 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-03-07 5:01 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-07 9:10 ` Mohan Kumar M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1173264752.5101.49.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).