From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E157DDE2A for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:49:43 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: References: <1173394873.3461.510.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:47:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1173458854.24454.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Woodhouse , rmk@arm.linux.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:11 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > David Woodhouse writes: > > > Most system calls seem to get added to i386 first. This patch > > automatically generates a warning for any new system call which is > > implemented on i386 but not the architecture currently being compiled. > > On PowerPC at the moment, for example, it results in these warnings: > > init/missing_syscalls.h:935:3: warning: #warning syscall sync_file_range not implemented > > init/missing_syscalls.h:947:3: warning: #warning syscall getcpu not implemented > > init/missing_syscalls.h:950:3: warning: #warning syscall epoll_pwait not implemented > > I think a better solution would be to finally switch to auto generated > system call tables for newer system calls. The original reason why the > architectures have different system call numbers -- compatibility with > another "native" Unix -- is completely obsolete now. This leaves only > minor differences of compat stub vs non compat stub and a few > architecture specific calls. > > Of course the existing syscall numbers can't be changed, but for all new > calls one could just add automatically for everybody. > > A global table with two entries (compat and non compat) and a per arch > override table should be sufficient. We need additional gunk for syscalls that can be called from SPEs on cell Ben.