From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0A9DDEBF for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 04:21:18 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls. From: David Woodhouse To: Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: References: <1173394873.3461.510.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:20:02 +0000 Message-Id: <1173460802.12760.2.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sam@ravnborg.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:11 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Of course the existing syscall numbers can't be changed, but for all new > calls one could just add automatically for everybody. > > A global table with two entries (compat and non compat) and a per arch > override table should be sufficient. Counterexample: sys_epoll_pwait. It'd be nice if it were that simple. It'd also be nice if people stopped thinking it was that simple :) -- dwmw2