From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (e4.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e4.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31B4DDDFF for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:07:50 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2CM7j58006655 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:07:45 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l2CM7ja9225354 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:07:45 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l2CM7iO9025978 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:07:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [powerpc] export symbols for use by lparcfg From: Will Schmidt To: Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <20070312213258.GA13648@lst.de> References: <20070312192114.16630.90671.stgit@joxer.rchland.ibm.com> <20070312213258.GA13648@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:07:40 -0500 Message-Id: <1173737260.7716.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au Reply-To: will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 22:32 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:21:14PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote: > > > > Updates the Kconfig to allow lparcfg to be built as a module, and > > add the necessary EXPORT_SYMBOLS needed for a successful build. > > > > Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt > > NACK. This is an awfull lot of deep down internal symbols, and there > is no reason to make this a module. If you fear about the space useage > on non-phype platforms better reintroduce something like the > __pmac/__chrp markers of the old ppc32 port. Understood.. This used to be a module, I just wanted it to be a module again. I'm not worried about the space usage, honest. :-) With this and Nathans response I'll happily second your NACK. -Will