From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Akinobu Mita <mita@fixstars.com>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Always use -mno-string & -mno-multiple
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:10:38 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1174543838.10836.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
powerpc: Always use -mno-string and -mno-multiple
The string and multiple load/store instructions are causing more
damage than help on a lot of processors where they are microcoded
and are generally no good for the kernel to use. Let's make sure
we don't emit them on any powerpc variant.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
Is that actually true ? What about 601 ? 4xx ? Do we want to keep
generating those for space on embedded processors where they actually
work (if they do) ?
Index: linux-cell/arch/powerpc/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-cell.orig/arch/powerpc/Makefile 2007-03-22 17:02:42.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-cell/arch/powerpc/Makefile 2007-03-22 17:05:23.000000000 +1100
@@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-altivec)
# kernel considerably.
CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-funit-at-a-time)
-ifndef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
-CFLAGS += -mstring
-endif
+# Never use string and multiple load/store instructions as they are
+# often slow when they are implemented at all
+CFLAGS += -mno-string -mno-multiple
ifeq ($(CONFIG_6xx),y)
CFLAGS += -mcpu=powerpc
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-22 6:10 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-03-22 12:02 ` [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Always use -mno-string & -mno-multiple Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-22 12:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1174543838.10836.21.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mita@fixstars.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).