From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (crystal.sipsolutions.net [195.210.38.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B59DDF67 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:31:10 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: more bogomips :) From: Johannes Berg To: Christian Kujau In-Reply-To: <1174811167.20440.6.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1174811167.20440.6.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9OFJyzuJakm/lKfKF10h" Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:31:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1174811463.20440.7.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-9OFJyzuJakm/lKfKF10h Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 10:26 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Interesting. This does raise the question of whether it's the right > thing to do, and it looks like a bug to me. [...] > because the timebase doesn't change with cpufreq. Thinko. We don't use lpj for udelay anyway. johannes --=-9OFJyzuJakm/lKfKF10h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGBjNH/ETPhpq3jKURAtsZAJ4jnsYhOFjyH/WuG5wVEE6++Li8XQCgifxt XYHP78GbZ2JvaB5XrFfIJt0= =jups -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9OFJyzuJakm/lKfKF10h--