linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: michael@ellerman.id.au
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	cbe-oss-dev <cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Ignore memory listed in PS3 device tree
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:16:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1175570169.30552.3.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175568133.16182.15.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:42 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> My point was it's not coming out of the device tree, it's just
> manually lmb_add'ed.
> 
> > My question remains: shouldn't Linux get that
> > information from the device tree, instead?  The
> > bootwrapper or bootloader can put it there.
> 
> Yes it _should_, but it doesn't.

It _used_ to. The 2.6.16 kernel just used the memory listed in the
device tree. That's _why_ we need this hack -- because when we boot from
2.6.16 with the memory listed in the device tree, it ends up getting
registered twice by the new kernel.

-- 
dwmw2

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-03  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-29 22:43 [PATCH] Ignore memory listed in PS3 device tree David Woodhouse
2007-03-29 23:23 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-30  0:27   ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-30 13:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-02  0:20   ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-02 17:36     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-03  2:42       ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-03  3:16         ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2007-04-03 14:45           ` David Woodhouse
2007-04-03 21:18             ` Geoff Levand
2007-04-03 21:48               ` David Woodhouse
2007-04-03 22:45                 ` Geoff Levand
2007-04-03 22:55                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-03 23:58                     ` Geoff Levand
2007-04-04  0:10                       ` David Woodhouse
2007-04-04 11:43                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-04  1:30                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-04  1:28               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-04  1:26             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-30 17:41 ` Geoff Levand
2007-03-30 17:45   ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-30 18:11     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-30 18:13       ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-31 15:27         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-31 22:34           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-31 22:42             ` David Woodhouse
2007-04-06 21:22 ` Geoff Levand
2007-04-06 22:34   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-06 22:43     ` David Woodhouse
2007-04-06 23:15       ` Geoff Levand
2007-04-06 23:35       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-06 23:44         ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1175570169.30552.3.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).