From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Ignore memory listed in PS3 device tree From: David Woodhouse To: michael@ellerman.id.au In-Reply-To: <1175568133.16182.15.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1175208237.3122.78.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <26babf7b7398794f08e7417377b3facc@kernel.crashing.org> <1175473220.3144.1.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <432af8a0f928491e7d376923829f40a0@kernel.crashing.org> <1175568133.16182.15.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:16:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1175570169.30552.3.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , cbe-oss-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:42 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > My point was it's not coming out of the device tree, it's just > manually lmb_add'ed. > > > My question remains: shouldn't Linux get that > > information from the device tree, instead? The > > bootwrapper or bootloader can put it there. > > Yes it _should_, but it doesn't. It _used_ to. The 2.6.16 kernel just used the memory listed in the device tree. That's _why_ we need this hack -- because when we boot from 2.6.16 with the memory listed in the device tree, it ends up getting registered twice by the new kernel. -- dwmw2