From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2DEDDE07 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:48:30 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] [POWERPC] make struct property's value a void * From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20070404.122129.45875882.davem@davemloft.net> References: <65f2b2574eca0b34e7986618cfbe7a6d@kernel.crashing.org> <20070403.112813.35016105.davem@davemloft.net> <19e36144f9d496f2a9670ac889435349@kernel.crashing.org> <20070404.122129.45875882.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:48:14 +1000 Message-Id: <1175737695.30879.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > No, that's just stupid. Peppering simple accesses to properties > with these wrappers is just going to make the code uglier for > no tangible gain whatsoever. > > There is no reason to make a mountain out of a mole hill wrt. this > stuff. > > And besides what Stephen is doing is just extending existing > practice, he isn't changing how any of this stuff is already > used. So this discussion should not get in the way of his > patches getting installed. /me very much agrees. Ben.